|
|
![]() |
||
|
|
Comparison of the information
regarding ADHD from the encounter data and the surveys
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Problems with attention reported on survey |
No problems with attention reported on survey |
|
|
ADHD diagnosis on encounter |
43 (72%) a |
17 (28%) b |
60 (100%) |
No ADHD diagnosis on encounter |
157 (7%) c |
1,930 (93%) d |
2,087 (100%) |
Cells a and d in Table 7 indicate agreement between the survey and the encounter data. Ninety-three percent (n=1,930) of the time when there was no ADHD diagnosis in the encounter data parents also did not report any attention problems, while 72% (n=43) of the time when there was an ADHD diagnosis in the encounter data parents did report attention problems. Cells b and c indicate areas of disagreement between the two data sources. Almost 30% of children (n=17) with an ADHD diagnosis in the encounter data were not reported as having attention problems by their parents, while 7% of children (n=157) without an ADHD diagnosis in the encounter files were reported as having attention problems.
ADHD diagnosis is still a rare occurrence, despite the fact that it occurs in up to 15% of the population. It is not difficult to imagine that parents may report attention problems prior to actually seeking medical intervention. It could also be that parents are reluctant to label their children as having attention problems There are also issues regarding differences in how the survey question was asked and how an encounter is coded that could have produced differences. For example, the survey question specifically asked if the child currently had a problem that had lasted at least the past 3 months. Some parents may not have indicated that the child had a problem currently because their symptoms were being controlled by an intervention. Another hypothesis is that the timing of the survey resulted in parents being asked about attention problems before children were actually diagnosed. This is unlikely since the encounters for ADHD were within the year prior to the survey for over 97% of the encounters. Regardless, it is important to know that differences in prevalence rates can occur when using encounter data and survey data.
Presentation of the above results to the Clinical Advisory Committee led members and researchers to question whether there were children within the population who were prescribed medications for ADHD but had not had an encounter within the year with a diagnosis code of ADHD. Children with at least one filled prescription for an ADHD-specific medication (see list below) were considered as having ADHD. Of 652 children with a filled prescription for an ADHD medication, 331 also had an encounter with ADHD as the diagnosis. Nearly half (321) did not have an encounter with ADHD as the diagnosis. Additionally, 40% of children with an encounter listing ADHD as the diagnosis did not have a filled prescription for an ADHD medication. When both diagnosis code and filled prescription are used to find children with ADHD, the number of children with ADHD increases from 563 to 884 (see Table 8).
The ADHD-specific medications included in our analysis were
Adderall
Cylert
Dexedrine
Methylphenidate hydrochloride
Pemoline
Ritalin
Strattera
Age group |
Number with ADHD |
Total number |
Percent with ADHD |
3-6 years |
73 |
4,751 |
1.5% |
7-9 years |
249 |
3,675 |
6.8% |
10-12 years |
295 |
3,491 |
8.5% |
13-15 years |
199 |
2,948 |
6.8% |
16-18 years |
68 |
2,296 |
3.0% |
Total |
884 |
17,161 |
5.2% |
The addition of children with a filled prescription for an ADHD-specific medication increases the percentage of children with ADHD by about one-third across all age groups. Table 9 indicates the age and rate of ADHD for children who were eligible for at least 11 months. The rate of ADHD is greater in this table than in Table 2 due to the addition of children with a filled prescription for an ADHD-specific medication. Rates in Table 9 more closely resemble national rates for ADHD by age.
Age group |
Number with ADHD |
Total number |
Percent with ADHD |
3-6 years |
27 |
1,230 |
2.2% |
7-9 years |
97 |
1,039 |
9.3% |
10-12 years |
126 |
1,033 |
12.2% |
13-15 years |
87 |
892 |
9.8% |
16-18 years |
31 |
752 |
4.1% |
Total |
368 |
4,946 |
7.4% |
Table 10 provides information on ADHD rates by age and gender. Though the rate of ADHD increases for all age and gender groups, the pattern remains the same: boys are identified as having ADHD three times as often as girls.
Age group |
Gender |
Number with ADHD |
Total Number |
Percent with ADHD |
3-6 years |
Female |
11 |
2,309 |
0.5% |
Male |
62 |
2,442 |
2.5% |
|
7-9 years |
Female |
72 |
1,802 |
4.0% |
Male |
177 |
1.873 |
9.5% |
|
10-12 years |
Female |
71 |
1,717 |
4.1% |
Male |
224 |
1,774 |
12.6% |
|
13-15 years |
Female |
50 |
1,435 |
3.5% |
Male |
149 |
1,513 |
9.8% |
|
16-18 years |
Female |
16 |
1,166 |
1.4% |
Male |
52 |
1,130 |
4.6% |
|
Total |
Female |
220 |
8,429 |
2.6% |
Male |
664 |
8,732 |
7.6% |