introduction
This report presents results from an analysis of outcomes of care
for children enrolled in the Healthy and Well Kids in Iowa program
(
hawk-i) . The analyses were conducted by
The University of Iowa Public Policy Center for the Iowa Department
of Human Services (IDHS). The
hawk-i program
is that portion of the Iowa State Child Health Insurance Program (SCHIP)
that exists separately from Medicaid and provides services to children
in families with incomes between 133% and 200% of the Federal Poverty
Level (FPL). The IDHS contracts with John Deere Health Plan, Iowa Health
Solutions and Wellmark Blue Cross/Blue Shield to provide services to
hawk-i enrollees
on a county-by-county basis. This report provides a summary of the
results for 10 different outcomes of care in four different service
areas: preventive visits for children and youth, dental visits, Measles,
Mumps and Rubella (MMR) immunizations, and behavioral and emotional
health visits. The results are presented separately for each of the
three health plans.
This first evaluation of outcome measures is part of the quality assurance
activities for the
hawk-i program. The measures were adapted from
the Healthplan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS). HEDIS
is a set of measures developed by the National Committee for Quality Assurance
(NCQA) for evaluating the outcomes of health plans. The hawk-i clinical
advisory committee, in collaboration with researchers from the University
of Iowa Public Policy Center, identified the four service areas. These HEDIS
measures were then adapted to fit the available hawk-i data.
The HEDIS outcome measures (i.e., utilization rates) were determined through
an analysis of claims, encounter, and eligibility data for children in each
of the hawk-i health plans. The inter-plan comparisons
presented here allow us to determine whether the plans are meeting the expectations
for care provision within the hawk-i program.
Outcome data should always be interpreted with caution. Limitations of
this data may include differential rates of missing data across the plans,
the systematic use of inappropriate codes, or the miscoding of diagnoses.
Despite these limitations, important knowledge is gained by comparing
outcome results between plans.
National Committee on Quality Assurance.
The Healthplan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS). Available at http://www.ncqa.org/Programs/HEDIS/ .
Most recently accessed October 3, 2003.