
Outcomes of care for
managed care enrollees
State fiscal year 2006
Final
report to the Iowa Department of Human Services
Elizabeth T
Momany, Ph.D
Associate
Research Scientist
Peter C.
Damiano, DDS, MPH
Professor
and Director
Knute D.
Carter, BSc (Ma&CompSc) (Hons)
Graduate
Research Assistant
Health
Policy Research Program
The
July 31,
2007
This study
was supported by the Iowa Department of Human Services and the U.S. Department
of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The
results and views expressed are the independent products of university research
and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agencies or The
University of Iowa.
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank Mr. Dennis Janssen,
Bureau Chief Managed Care and Clinical Services, Iowa Medicaid Enterprise, Iowa
Department of Human Services for his assistance with the completion of this
research.
Special thanks to our colleagues at the Public
Policy Center. Professor David Forkenbrock, Founding Director, who provided the
valuable resources of the Center to us. A very special thank you to Kevin
Sellers for his development and maintenance of the database used to house and analyze
the data. Kathy Holeton, administrative assistant, Teresa Lopes, editor, Cole
Grolmus, student computer specialist, and Peggy Waters, secretary all provided
valuable assistance to this research
Table of Contents
Outcomes of care for Iowa Medicaid managed care enrollees SFY 2006
Well-child visits in the first 15
months of life
Well-child visits in the third,
fourth, fifth and sixth years of life.
Children and adolescents’ access to
primary care practitioners
Use of appropriate medications for
people with asthma
Adults’ access to
preventive/ambulatory health services.
Comprehensive diabetes care:
Hemoglobin A1c testing
Appendix A: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2006
Appendix B: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2005
Appendix C: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2004
Appendix D: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2003
Appendix E: Technical specifications for outcomes measures
Outcomes of
care for
SFY 2006
The current movement to Pay-for-Performance by insurers continues to increase the importance of using valid outcome measures and understanding the results they generate. The Iowa Medicaid program has been involved in utilizing HEDIS outcome measures for over 10 years to improve quality of care. Since 2003, the outcome measures utilized have remained constant and include: well-child visits in the first 15 months of life; well child-visits in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th years of life; children and adolescents’ access to primary care providers; annual dental visit; use of appropriate medications for people with asthma; adults’ access to preventive/ambulatory health services; hemoglobin A1c testing; and prenatal and postpartum care.
Outcome measures are computed with regard to the managed care eligible Medicaid population. Most measures require that an enrollee be eligible for at least 11 months of the year for which the measure is being calculated. For well-child visits in the first 15 months of life children must be enrolled for 14 of the first 15 months of life. For prenatal and postpartum care various enrollment periods are utilized to determine the rates.
By coupling the HEDIS outcome measures with the CAHPS survey results, we are able to paint a reliable picture about the care that is received through the Medicaid program. In addition, we are able to compare our rates at the program level with rates from across the nation for other Medicaid programs and a variety of commercial insurers and are able to compare our rates over time.
Within the managed care eligible Medicaid program we have
broken the enrollees into three groups: those enrolled in an HMO (
The population of Medicaid eligible people enrolled in a TANF-related program for at least 11 months during SFY 2006 are younger than the state population. These enrollees are also more likely to be female and non-caucasian. Based on the demographics of this group we know that they will have a more difficult time accessing medical care, once again highlighting the importance of calculating and tracking relevant outcome measures.
The number of people within the program for at least 11 months rose by almost 20% (more than 24,000), from SFY 2005 to SFY 2006. This increase was distributed across all age and gender groups, however the largest increase was for males 19 to 21 years of age with an increase of 29.3% (258 people). However, the most people were added in the category of girls and boys 7–12 years of age.
Table
1: Comparisons
of demographics for Medicaid enrollees who were eligible for at least 11 months
in SFY 2006 and the state population as estimated by the census
|
Characteristic |
Medicaid
Enrollees |
State
Population |
|
Age group |
|
|
|
0–2 years |
14.2% |
3.7% |
|
3–6 years |
21.3% |
4.7% |
|
7–12 years |
24.5% |
7.4% |
|
13–18 years |
18.4% |
8.1% |
|
19–21 years |
3.7% |
4.4% |
|
22–44 years |
15.9% |
31.2% |
|
45–64 years |
1.7% |
25.6% |
|
65 years and
over |
0.3% |
14.7% |
|
Gender |
|
|
|
Male |
43.8% |
49.2% |
|
Female |
56.2% |
50.8% |
|
Race |
|
|
|
White |
61.4% |
91.5% |
|
African-American |
9.0% |
2.3% |
|
Hispanic |
5.1% |
3.7% |
|
Other
including unknown |
24.5% |
2.5% |
Table 2: Medicaid enrollees eligible for
at least 11 months by age and gender
SFY 2006
|
Age group |
|
Female |
Male |
Total |
|
0–2 years |
Number |
10,534 |
10,981 |
21,515 |
|
|
Percent |
49.0% |
51.0% |
100.0% |
|
3–6 years |
Number |
15,909 |
16,460 |
32,369 |
|
|
Percent |
49.1% |
50.9% |
100.0% |
|
7–12 years |
Number |
18,349 |
18,817 |
37,166 |
|
|
Percent |
49.4% |
50.6% |
100.0% |
|
13–18 years |
Number |
14,294 |
13,708 |
28,002 |
|
|
Percent |
51.0% |
49.0% |
100.0% |
|
19–21 years |
Number |
4,436 |
1,138 |
5,574 |
|
|
Percent |
79.6% |
20.4% |
100.0% |
|
22–44 years |
Number |
19,746 |
4,402 |
24,148 |
|
|
Percent |
81.8% |
18.2% |
100.0% |
|
45–64 years |
Number |
1,650 |
942 |
2,592 |
|
|
Percent |
63.7% |
36.3% |
100.0% |
|
over 65 years |
Number |
344 |
74 |
418 |
|
|
Percent |
82.3% |
17.7% |
100.0% |
|
Total |
Number |
85,262 |
66,522 |
151,784 |
|
|
Percent |
56.2% |
43.8% |
100.0% |
Well-child visits in the first 15 months of life
In accordance with the
Figure 1 provides a comparison of the rates for zero visits and 6 or more visits for the three groups over the last 3 years (SFY 2004–SFY 2006). This figure indicates that though the proportion of children who had made no visits during the first 15 months of life has not changed dramatically for any of the groups, the proportion of children who received six or more visits has decreased. Though it is unclear why this may be happening, it seems to tell us that though children are getting in to see the doctor, they are not receiving as many visits as are recommended. This may result in a lack of anticipatory guidance for parents, reduce opportunities for development screening by the physician, and interrupted vaccination schedules.
Table 3: Number and proportion of
children receiving from zero to
six or more well-child visits in the first 15 months of life
SFY 2006
|
Number of visits |
|
FFS |
MediPASS |
HMO |
Total |
|
0 visits |
Number |
240 |
711 |
5 |
956 |
|
|
Percent |
9.4% |
10.0% |
1.7% |
9.6% |
|
1 visit |
Number |
141 |
464 |
11 |
616 |
|
|
Percent |
5.5% |
6.5% |
3.7% |
6.2% |
|
2 visits |
Number |
155 |
394 |
28 |
577 |
|
|
Percent |
6.1% |
5.5% |
9.4% |
5.8% |
|
3 visits |
Number |
224 |
546 |
38 |
808 |
|
|
Percent |
8.8% |
7.7% |
12.7% |
8.1% |
|
4 visits |