Outcomes of care for Iowa Medicaid
managed care enrollees

 

 

State fiscal year 2006

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Final report to the Iowa Department of Human Services

 

 

 

 

Elizabeth T Momany, Ph.D

Associate Research Scientist

 

Peter C. Damiano, DDS, MPH

Professor and Director

 

Knute D. Carter, BSc (Ma&CompSc) (Hons)

Graduate Research Assistant

 

 

Health Policy Research Program

Public Policy Center

The University of Iowa

 

 

July 31, 2007

 

 

This study was supported by the Iowa Department of Human Services and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. The results and views expressed are the independent products of university research and do not necessarily represent the views of the funding agencies or The University of Iowa.



Acknowledgements

 

The authors would like to thank Mr. Dennis Janssen, Bureau Chief Managed Care and Clinical Services, Iowa Medicaid Enterprise, Iowa Department of Human Services for his assistance with the completion of this research.

 

Special thanks to our colleagues at the Public Policy Center. Professor David Forkenbrock, Founding Director, who provided the valuable resources of the Center to us. A very special thank you to Kevin Sellers for his development and maintenance of the database used to house and analyze the data. Kathy Holeton, administrative assistant, Teresa Lopes, editor, Cole Grolmus, student computer specialist, and Peggy Waters, secretary all provided valuable assistance to this research


Table of Contents

 

Outcomes of care for Iowa Medicaid managed care enrollees SFY 2006. 1

Introduction. 1

Eligibility. 1

Outcome measures. 3

Well-child visits in the first 15 months of life. 3

Performance target 5

Well-child visits in the third, fourth, fifth and sixth years of life. 6

Performance target 7

Annual dental visit 8

Performance target 9

Children and adolescents’ access to primary care practitioners. 9

Performance target 10

Use of appropriate medications for people with asthma. 11

Performance target 13

Adults’ access to preventive/ambulatory health services. 13

Performance target 14

Prenatal and Postpartum Care. 14

Performance target 17

Comprehensive diabetes care: Hemoglobin A1c testing. 17

Performance target 18

Appendix A: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2006. 19

Appendix B: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2005. 20

Appendix C: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2004. 22

Appendix D: Summary of Outcomes by managed care plan, SFY 2003. 23

Appendix E: Technical specifications for outcomes measures. 24

 

 



Outcomes of care for Iowa Medicaid managed care enrollees
SFY 2006

Introduction

The current movement to Pay-for-Performance by insurers continues to increase the importance of using valid outcome measures and understanding the results they generate. The Iowa Medicaid program has been involved in utilizing HEDIS outcome measures for over 10 years to improve quality of care. Since 2003, the outcome measures utilized have remained constant and include: well-child visits in the first 15 months of life; well child-visits in the 3rd, 4th, 5th, and 6th years of life; children and adolescents’ access to primary care providers; annual dental visit; use of appropriate medications for people with asthma; adults’ access to preventive/ambulatory health services; hemoglobin A1c testing; and prenatal and postpartum care.

Outcome measures are computed with regard to the managed care eligible Medicaid population. Most measures require that an enrollee be eligible for at least 11 months of the year for which the measure is being calculated. For well-child visits in the first 15 months of life children must be enrolled for 14 of the first 15 months of life. For prenatal and postpartum care various enrollment periods are utilized to determine the rates.

By coupling the HEDIS outcome measures with the CAHPS survey results, we are able to paint a reliable picture about the care that is received through the Medicaid program. In addition, we are able to compare our rates at the program level with rates from across the nation for other Medicaid programs and a variety of commercial insurers and are able to compare our rates over time.

Eligibility

Within the managed care eligible Medicaid program we have broken the enrollees into three groups: those enrolled in an HMO (Coventry), those in MediPASS, and those in the fee-for-service (FFS) or traditional Medicaid program. For most outcomes, enrollees had to be eligible for at least 11 months during the state fiscal year (SFY) 2006. Of those eligible for at least 11 months during SFY 2006: 4,205 were in an HMO; 109,075 were in MediPASS; and 38,504 were in FFS. A comparison of demographics for this population as compared to the state are shown in Table 1, while the age and gender breakdowns are shown in Table 2.

The population of Medicaid eligible people enrolled in a TANF-related program for at least 11 months during SFY 2006 are younger than the state population. These enrollees are also more likely to be female and non-caucasian. Based on the demographics of this group we know that they will have a more difficult time accessing medical care, once again highlighting the importance of calculating and tracking relevant outcome measures.

The number of people within the program for at least 11 months rose by almost 20% (more than 24,000), from SFY 2005 to SFY 2006. This increase was distributed across all age and gender groups, however the largest increase was for males 19 to 21 years of age with an increase of 29.3% (258 people). However, the most people were added in the category of girls and boys 7–12 years of age.

Table 1: Comparisons of demographics for Medicaid enrollees who were eligible for at least 11 months in SFY 2006 and the state population as estimated by the census

Characteristic

Medicaid Enrollees

State Population

Age group

 

 

0–2 years

14.2%

3.7%

3–6 years

21.3%

4.7%

7–12 years

24.5%

7.4%

13–18 years

18.4%

8.1%

19–21 years

3.7%

4.4%

22–44 years

15.9%

31.2%

45–64 years

1.7%

25.6%

65 years and over

0.3%

14.7%

Gender

 

 

Male

43.8%

49.2%

Female

56.2%

50.8%

Race

 

 

White

61.4%

91.5%

African-American

9.0%

2.3%

Hispanic

5.1%

3.7%

Other including unknown

24.5%

2.5%

 


Table 2: Medicaid enrollees eligible for at least 11 months by age and gender
SFY 2006

Age group

 

Female

Male

Total

0–2 years

Number

10,534

10,981

21,515

 

Percent

49.0%

51.0%

100.0%

3–6 years

Number

15,909

16,460

32,369

 

Percent

49.1%

50.9%

100.0%

7–12 years

Number

18,349

18,817

37,166

 

Percent

49.4%

50.6%

100.0%

13–18 years

Number

14,294

13,708

28,002

 

Percent

51.0%

49.0%

100.0%

19–21 years

Number

4,436

1,138

5,574

 

Percent

79.6%

20.4%

100.0%

22–44 years

Number

19,746

4,402

24,148

 

Percent

81.8%

18.2%

100.0%

45–64 years

Number

1,650

942

2,592

 

Percent

63.7%

36.3%

100.0%

over 65 years

Number

344

74

418

 

Percent

82.3%

17.7%

100.0%

Total

Number

85,262

66,522

151,784

 

Percent

56.2%

43.8%

100.0%

 

Outcome measures

Well-child visits in the first 15 months of life

In accordance with the American Academy of Pediatrics recommendations, the Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) Early Periodic Screening, Diagnosis and Treatment (EPSDT) schedule indicates that children should have 8 visits during the first 15 months of life. The EPSDT schedule recommends visits at 2-3 days and 1, 2, 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 months. There are seven rates computed for this HEDIS measure, one rate for each visit number: no visits, 1 visit, 2 visits, 3 visits, 4 visits, 5 visits, and 6 or more visits. The denominator for these rates is the number of children who turned 15 months of age by June 30, 2006 and were eligible for at least 14 of the first 15 months of their life. The numerator is the number of children who had each number of visits from zero to six or more.

Figure 1 provides a comparison of the rates for zero visits and 6 or more visits for the three groups over the last 3 years (SFY 2004–SFY 2006). This figure indicates that though the proportion of children who had made no visits during the first 15 months of life has not changed dramatically for any of the groups, the proportion of children who received six or more visits has decreased. Though it is unclear why this may be happening, it seems to tell us that though children are getting in to see the doctor, they are not receiving as many visits as are recommended. This may result in a lack of anticipatory guidance for parents, reduce opportunities for development screening by the physician, and interrupted vaccination schedules.

Table 3: Number and proportion of children receiving from zero to
six or more well-child visits in the first 15 months of life
 SFY 2006

Number of visits

 

FFS

MediPASS

HMO

Total

0 visits

Number

240

711

5

956

 

Percent

9.4%

10.0%

1.7%

9.6%

1 visit

Number

141

464

11

616

 

Percent

5.5%

6.5%

3.7%

6.2%

2 visits

Number

155

394

28

577

 

Percent

6.1%

5.5%

9.4%

5.8%

3 visits

Number

224

546

38

808

 

Percent

8.8%

7.7%

12.7%

8.1%

4 visits